HOME
algebra 2 exponential functions 4
powers 3
linear equations 7
simple trinomials products binomials 4
adding fractions unlike denominators 1
laws exponents dividing monomials 1
solving equations 15
multiplying polynomials 7
multiplying dividing rational expressions 4
algebra 2 solving systems linear inequalities 3
mixed numbers notation 1
linear equations inequalities one variable 1
quadratic formula 3
fractions decimals 2
algebra 2 graphing logarithmic functions 1
multiplying numbers 13
fractions 11
solving systems equations two lines 3
algebra 2 solving nonlinear equations factoring 4
solving linear systems equations elimination 1
addition method 3
rationalizing denominators 3
simplifying complex fractions 10
factoring trinomials 16
linear relations equations 1
polynomials 3
axis symmetry vertices parabolas 2
equations quadratic form 1
polynomial equations 3
subtracting reverses 1
non linear equations 1
exponents order operations 1
factoring trinomials grouping 4
factoring trinomials 7
distance formula 3
algebra 2 invariants under rotation 1
multiplying dividing monomials 2
algebra 2 solving system three linear equations elimination 1
multiplying numbers 14
algebra 2 powers i 1
solving quadratic polynomial equations 1
slope intercept form equation lines 1
equations lines point slope 2
square roots 2
integral exponents 1
algebra 2 adding subtracting functions 3
product rule radicals 1
solving compound linear inequalities 3
axis symmetry vertices parabolas 1
multiplying rational expressions 3
reducing rational expressions 2
properties negative exponents 1
fractions 6
numbers factors reducing fractions lowest terms 1
solving quadratic equations 6
factoring completely general quadratic trinomials 2
solving formulas variables 1
factoring polynomials 8
decimal numbers fractions 1
multiplication properties exponents 1
multiplying fractions 5
multiplying numbers 12
adding subtracting rational expressions different denominators 5

Fractions

Fractions

900000 ÷ 300 = ? 30 ÷ 100 = ?

Write 900,000 ÷ 300 as . We are used to seeing the divided – often called the numerator - above the fraction line and the divider (or denominator) below the fraction line. We can write 900000 as 9 × 100000 and 300 as 3 × 100. The task then looks like .

Let us first consider , which equals 3. We should have divided something 100000 time bigger than 9, making the result 100000 times bigger. We should also have divided by something 100 times bigger than 3, making the result 100 times smaller. What results from making something 100000 times bigger and then 100 times smaller? You can think of the latter as 10 times smaller and then 10 times smaller again, each time knocking one 0 off the 100000, leaving 1000 as the net 'adjustment' to the 3.

So .

In the same way, is just because there is the same m -fold increase as the m-fold decrease. Note that this does not work with, for example, (Try taking m = 3 which gives which is 2, not 3). In the case of 30 ÷ 100, (i.e. 30 %), again we start with and then make it ten times bigger (because the divided is 30, not 3) and one hundred times smaller (because the divider is 100, not 1). The net adjustment is 10 times smaller than the 3, namely 0.3

Remember: The correct value of a fraction can also always be found by long division.

   


script generation took $diff s "; ?>