HOME
algebra 2 exponential functions 4
powers 3
linear equations 7
simple trinomials products binomials 4
adding fractions unlike denominators 1
laws exponents dividing monomials 1
solving equations 15
multiplying polynomials 7
multiplying dividing rational expressions 4
algebra 2 solving systems linear inequalities 3
mixed numbers notation 1
linear equations inequalities one variable 1
quadratic formula 3
fractions decimals 2
algebra 2 graphing logarithmic functions 1
multiplying numbers 13
fractions 11
solving systems equations two lines 3
algebra 2 solving nonlinear equations factoring 4
solving linear systems equations elimination 1
addition method 3
rationalizing denominators 3
simplifying complex fractions 10
factoring trinomials 16
linear relations equations 1
polynomials 3
axis symmetry vertices parabolas 2
equations quadratic form 1
polynomial equations 3
subtracting reverses 1
non linear equations 1
exponents order operations 1
factoring trinomials grouping 4
factoring trinomials 7
distance formula 3
algebra 2 invariants under rotation 1
multiplying dividing monomials 2
algebra 2 solving system three linear equations elimination 1
multiplying numbers 14
algebra 2 powers i 1
solving quadratic polynomial equations 1
slope intercept form equation lines 1
equations lines point slope 2
square roots 2
integral exponents 1
algebra 2 adding subtracting functions 3
product rule radicals 1
solving compound linear inequalities 3
axis symmetry vertices parabolas 1
multiplying rational expressions 3
reducing rational expressions 2
properties negative exponents 1
fractions 6
numbers factors reducing fractions lowest terms 1
solving quadratic equations 6
factoring completely general quadratic trinomials 2
solving formulas variables 1
factoring polynomials 8
decimal numbers fractions 1
multiplication properties exponents 1
multiplying fractions 5
multiplying numbers 12
adding subtracting rational expressions different denominators 5

Rationalizing the Denominator

Rationalizing the Denominator

A. What It Means to Rationalize the Denominator

In order that all of us doing math can compare answers, we agree upon a common conversation, or set of rules, concerning the form of the answers.

For instance, we could easily agree that we would not leave an answer in the form of 3 + 4, but would write 7 instead.

When the topic switches to that of radicals, those doing math have agreed that a RADICAL IN SIMPLE FORM will not (among other things) have a radical in the denominator of a fraction. We will all change the form so there is no radical in the denominator.

Now a radical in the denominator will not be something as simple as . Instead, it will have a radicand which will not come out from under the radical sign like .

Since is an irrational number, and we need to make it NOT irrational, the process of changing its form so it is no longer irrational is called RATIONALIZING THE DENOMINATOR.

B. There are 3 Cases of Rationalizing the Denominator

1. Case I : There is ONE TERM in the denominator and it is a SQUARE ROOT.

2. Case II : There is ONE TERM in the denominator, however, THE INDEX IS GREATER THAN TWO. It might be a cube root or a fourth root.

3. Case III : There are TWO TERMS in the denominator.

Let's study Case II:

2. Case II : There is ONE TERM in the denominator, however, THE INDEX IS GREATER THAN TWO. It might be a cube root or a fourth root.

Example:

For the first part of this discussion, we will ignore the top and\par concentrate on the denominator.

Procedure: Multiply top and bottom by whatever works in order to create a perfect cube in the denominator.

We need to multiply the bottom by something that will make the result a cube...

So we can take the cube root of it here...

Which would cause the radical to be gone down here.

Well...

But we also need to multiply it by an x so that we get x 3 (which is also a cube).

So there, we've gotten rid of the radical in the denominator. We've, therefore, rationalized the denominator. Now we'll look at the entire problem with the numerator included this time.

Remember, whatever we do to the bottom, we must also do to the top.

Original problem:

Here is our adjustment --- what we needed to multiply top and bottom by so the bottom would become a perfect square.

And here we see the result of our multiplication on the bottom. We've created something of which we can take the cube root.

Notice we can cancel the Xs since they are factors and represent the same number.

Answer

   


script generation took $diff s "; ?>